Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#9625 closed defect (duplicate)
DataGrid does not render on an inactive tab
Reported by: | Sanjay Madhavan | Owned by: | Bryan Forbes |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | tbd |
Component: | DojoX Grid | Version: | 1.3.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description
using dojo 1.3.2, FF 3.5
I was having a lot of trouble getting DataGrid? to display within a content pane.
I have a html page with a tabbed interface with multiple tabs and each tab containing a BorderContainer? with design="headline".
My first tab had non grid content and that worked fine.
My second tab had a DataGrid? and if i put the DataGrid? as the only widget on the tab it worked.
If I put the DataGrid? inside a ContentPane? it refused to display.
I had already explicitly set the width and height of all parents of the DataGrid?. In addition the body has a style of width and height 100%.
Finally I saw a post with a workaround of displaying the grid outside the contentpane and then moving it into the contentpane after the grid was built.
That sort of worked for me when I noticed yet another issue that if the grid was built on an inactive tab it will not display!.
I am attaching a sample of the problem. There are two files one that works and one that doesnt.
The sample is a modified version of a working DataGrid? that I would in another ticket.
I would really appreciate if someone could give me a workaround for the grid within the ContentPane? issue and the issue of building a grid on an inactive tab.
Regards
Sanjay
Attachments (3)
Change History (5)
Changed 13 years ago by
Attachment: | testgrid_cdn_works.html added |
---|
Changed 13 years ago by
Attachment: | testgrid_cdn_doesnotwork.html added |
---|
Changed 13 years ago by
Attachment: | test_response.txt added |
---|
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by
Component: | General → DojoX Grid |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from anonymous to Bryan Forbes |
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Duplicate of #9458