Opened 11 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#8355 closed defect (fixed)
[jsdoc] strange mixing behavior in pseudo-docs
Reported by: | dante | Owned by: | Neil Roberts |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | 1.4 |
Component: | Doc parser | Version: | 1.2.3 |
Keywords: | Cc: | Adam Peller | |
Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description
In dojox/analytics/Urchin.js I attepted to dojo.mixin(djConfig inside a psuedo-comment block. This has strange results:
http://api.dojotoolkit.org/jsdoc/dojo/1.2/djConfig reports urchin as the only available djConfig param
http://api.dojotoolkit.org/jsdoc/dojo/HEAD/djConfig reports all except urchin
and clicking on the version tabs: http://api.dojotoolkit.org/jsdoc/dojo/1.2/djConfig/.switch/HEAD
changes the version tab labels to "dojox 1.2" and "dojox HEAD", and only displays the urchin djConfig
a) how to doc the usage of a djConfig from outside of bootstrap b) ensure switching tabs in jsdoc maintains object relationships
Change History (5)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by
similarly, all the mixins for dojo.number/dojo.date and dijit.form that we worked so hard on have all regressed on the live api doc site.
comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:4 Changed 10 years ago by
Cc: | Adam Peller added |
---|
the urchin portion of this ticket is resolved. @Peller, links to number/date examples where this regressed? is it fixed now too?
comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
additionally, the actual docs for the urchin member are missing.
sample in question: