Opened 12 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#7245 closed enhancement (patchwelcome)
MultiSelect: populate options from data store
| Reported by: | Goran Miskovic | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | high | Milestone: | 1.13 |
| Component: | Dijit - Form | Version: | 1.1.1 |
| Keywords: | multiselect, data store | Cc: | dante |
| Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description
As per discussion in http://dojotoolkit.org/forum/dijit-dijit-0-9/dijit-support/populating-markup-multiselect it would be grate to have option to populate options from data store and not only from markup.
I am not using svn so I can't create difference. Added lines in attached file are prefixed with ++.
Attachments (5)
Change History (26)
comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by
| Milestone: | tbd → 1.3 |
|---|---|
| Owner: | set to Nathan Toone |
comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by
Changed 12 years ago by
| Attachment: | MultiSelect.tar.gz added |
|---|
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by
It looks as if it is not possible to upload archive files. Or to be precise uploaded archive is not kept in original format. Sorry about mess. :)
Changed 12 years ago by
| Attachment: | multiselect.txt added |
|---|
Changed 12 years ago by
| Attachment: | MultiSelectDifference.js added |
|---|
Changed 12 years ago by
| Attachment: | MultiSelect.js added |
|---|
comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.3 → 1.4 |
|---|
bumping 1.4 tickets to 1.5, and most 1.3 tickets to 1.4
comment:5 Changed 12 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.4 → future |
|---|
comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by
| Owner: | set to Douglas Hays |
|---|
comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by
I got MultiSelect? populated from data store working with dojo 1.5 and if needed I can upload the patch.
comment:9 Changed 9 years ago by
| Component: | Dijit → Dijit - Form |
|---|
comment:10 Changed 8 years ago by
| Milestone: | future → 1.9 |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from Douglas Hays to Goran Miskovic |
| Status: | new → pending |
We obviously did not get a chance to look at this in a reasonable amount of time.
If you would like to resubmit a patch against Dojo 1.9 trunk using object stores, I will review and get it into trunk.
Please make sure you have a CLA on file, http://staging.dojofoundation.org/about/claForm
comment:11 Changed 8 years ago by
| Owner: | changed from Goran Miskovic to Douglas Hays |
|---|---|
| Status: | pending → assigned |
Oh, I think this was already implemented via [17740] and then transferred to dijit in [19071]. Just needs a test case (actually, there's already a test case in dojox/form/tests/test_CheckedMultiSelect.html, so that should just be moved to dijit.
(If the support was there from those commits, test case should be added and then this should be closed as fixed in 1.4.)
comment:12 Changed 8 years ago by
comment:13 Changed 8 years ago by
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
comment:14 Changed 8 years ago by
| Resolution: | fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
As I wrote above: If the support was there from those commits, test case should be added and then this should be closed as fixed in 1.4.
Actually, looks like most (or all?) of the tests in dojox/form/tests/test_CheckedMultiSelect.html should be moved to dijit/tests/form/test_MultiSelect.html.
comment:15 Changed 8 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.9 → 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → assigned |
comment:16 Changed 8 years ago by
dijit/form/MultiSelect does not inherit from _FormSelectWidget and so doesn't currently support stores
comment:17 Changed 8 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.4 → 2.0 |
|---|
Most of CheckedMultiSelect? needs to be merged with MultiSelect? and have it become the new base class.
comment:18 Changed 8 years ago by
| Milestone: | 2.0 → 1.10 |
|---|
Might as well check this into SVN and then merge to github, so it's available for the 1.x and 2.x streams.
comment:19 Changed 7 years ago by
| Owner: | Douglas Hays deleted |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → open |
comment:20 Changed 7 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.10 → 2.0 |
|---|
Nobody is assigned to this. waiting for someone to be assigned moving this out of 1.10.
comment:21 Changed 5 years ago by
| Milestone: | 2.0 → 1.12 |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → patchwelcome |
| Status: | open → closed |
Given that no one has shown interest in creating a patch in the past 5+ years, I'm closing this as patchwelcome.
It looks as if I've uploaded original file. :(
Anyways in attached archive there is difference file (created manually), changed file and example.