#7004 closed defect (fixed)
regexp backreference doesn't work right in ValidationTextBox
| Reported by: | Owned by: | Douglas Hays | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | high | Milestone: | 1.2 |
| Component: | Dijit - Form | Version: | 1.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description (last modified by )
I took a regular expression documented on the web as good for dates and tried it in a dojo ValidationTextBox? and it did not work well. Dojo does not seem to like a backreference much. But if I test a date against the pattern in Javascript, it returns 'true' so I believe that the expression is good.
Here is my testcase. Note that you'll have to fix up the dojo paths when you try it out.
<html>
<head>
<title>Dojo: Hello World!</title>
<!-- SECTION 1 -->
<style type="text/css">
@import "http://b2aaaron.austin.ibm.com/dojo-1.0.2/dijit/themes/tundra/tundra.css";
@import "http://b2aaaron.austin.ibm.com/dojo-1.0.2/dojo/resources/dojo.css"
</style>
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://b2aaaron.austin.ibm.com/dojo-1.0.2/dojo/dojo.js"
djConfig="parseOnLoad: true"></script>
<!-- SECTION 2 -->
<script type="text/javascript">
// Load Dojo's code relating to the Button widget
dojo.require("dijit.form.ValidationTextBox");
dojo.require("dojo.regexp");
</script>
<script>
dojo.addOnLoad(function(){
var input = document.createElement('input');
input.id = 'jsDijit';
input.value = '3';
document.body.appendChild(input);
var control = new dijit.form.ValidationTextBox({
value: "2008-12-12",
regExp: "(19|20)\\d\\d([- /.])(0[1-9]|1[012])\\2(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])",
trim: true,
invalidMessage: "value must be a date of pattern yyyy/mm/yy"
}, input);
var testValue = "2008-12-12";
var pattern = /(19|20)\d\d([- /.])(0[1-9]|1[012])\2(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])/g;
var testResult = pattern.test(testValue);
var jsResult = document.createElement('span');
jsResult.innerHTML = "<br/>"+testValue+" matches the regular expression: "+testResult;
document.body.appendChild(jsResult);
});
</script>
</head>
<body class="tundra">
<h2> This should show two 'valid' ValidationTextBoxes </h2>
<input id="goodinput" dojotype="dijit.form.ValidationTextBox"
regExp="(19|20)\d\d([- /.])(0[1-9]|1[012])\2(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])" trim="true" invalidMessage="value must be a date of pattern yyyy/mm/yy" value="2008-12-12">
</input>
</body>
</html>
The problem seems to be with (19|20)\d\d...if I replace that with \d{4}, then the text boxes seem to be ok with that.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at aaronr at us.ibm.com
Change History (8)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Reporter: | changed from guest to [email protected]… |
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by
Sorry I was late in responding, been out on vacation.
The reason for using the backreference was to ensure that the date separators were the same. Without the backreference, 2008/12-12 would be valid. With the back reference, then 2008/12/12 or 2008-12-12 would be enforced.
--Aaron
comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by
| Milestone: | → 1.4 |
|---|---|
| Owner: | set to Douglas Hays |
Oh I see, makes sense.
comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.4 → 1.2 |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → invalid |
| Status: | new → closed |
Every ( in a regexp increments the backreference count. (19|20) is \1. Change it to (?:19|20) in order to not create a backreference.
comment:5 Changed 14 years ago by
| Resolution: | invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
I don't know if we are on the same page. I'm trying to get at the value represented by ([- /.]) which should be \2 (which is what I'm trying to use without success). I don't see how what I'm doing is incorrect but if it is, I'd love to know why. And since the rule seems to work fine in JS, I think I've got it right.
comment:6 Changed 14 years ago by
The problem is that the validation code adds (...)$ around the user's re. So
2 needs to be
3 and then it'll work, or (19|20) could be changed to (?:19|20) and it'll work.
I'm going to change (...)$ to (?:...)$ so that this test will work, but existing users who have figured out the extra backreference will now be broken.
comment:7 Changed 14 years ago by
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
comment:8 Changed 11 years ago by
| Component: | Dijit → Dijit - Form |
|---|
BTW you can attach testcases w/the attach file button (that's preferred).
I'm not sure why you are using backreferences though. It seems like you can't access the data from the backreferences anyway, right?