Opened 14 years ago

Closed 14 years ago

Last modified 14 years ago

#6126 closed defect (invalid)

dijit.tree.TreeStoreModel.mayHaveChildren incorrectly implemented

Reported by: guest Owned by:
Priority: high Milestone:
Component: Dijit Version: 1.1b1
Keywords: mayHaveChildren, TreeStoreModel, ForestStoreModel Cc:
Blocked By: Blocking:


The current implementation uses: return dojo.some(this.childrenAttr, function(attr){

return, attr);

}, this);

but as this.childrenAttr is a string, every character is treated as an element of an array. For a childrenAttr like 'children', the function that will be executed is

return, 'c') return, 'h') return, 'i') ...

The correct, expected behaviour, occurs when wrapping the value this.childrenAttr in an Array, thus using the implementation:

return dojo.some([this.childrenAttr], function(attr){

return, attr);

}, this);

Change History (5)

comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by bill

Resolution: invalid
Status: newclosed

No, it's an array, see the declaration:

	// childrenAttr: String
	//		one ore more attributes that holds children of a tree node
	childrenAttr: ["children"],

comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by bill

PS: but I will change the variable name to be childrenAttrs so it's less confusing. Plus fix the comment to say String{].

comment:3 Changed 14 years ago by bill

(In [12981]) Refs #6126, #6127: fix comment for childrenAttr to note that it's an array, plus change name to childrenAttrs to be less confusing. !strict

comment:4 Changed 14 years ago by bill

(In [12982]) Refs #6126, #6127: change name to childrenAttrs to be less confusing (except for Tree widget itself, for back compat) !strict

comment:5 Changed 14 years ago by bill

(In [12984]) Refs #6126, #6127: Fix bug in testcase; childrenAttrs is an array so needs to be passed in as such.

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.