Opened 13 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
#5532 closed defect (fixed)
Source tags not propertly identified in jsdoc
Reported by: | dante | Owned by: | Neil Roberts |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | 1.2 |
Component: | General | Version: | 1.0 |
Keywords: | jsdoc source | Cc: | |
Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description (last modified by )
refs #5531 , the link on that page points to the dojo.attr() api info.
the source block listed shows part of the comments intended for description.
(also, #5531 illustrates exactly why we so desperately need versioning working in jsdoc)
even if it's just a way to use a set of data, like ?q=jsdoc/blahblah/v=11000 and even better, because we were talking about regexp and htaccess and rewrite rules:
dojotoolkit.org/api/1.0/dojo.attr - "not found" dojotoolkit.org/api/trunk/dojo.attr - "has data"
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by
Priority: | high → normal |
---|
comment:3 Changed 12 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
versioning and hot-linking are available no in api-staging.dtk ... seems to be working as expected.
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Right now, everything's HEAD (which appears in current URLs), cron is running very frequently, and versioning is being tested. I'm not sure of which part of the existing plan isn't covered by this