Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
#5425 closed defect (invalid)
Tooltip delay assumes connectId is visible
Reported by: | tk | Owned by: | tk |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | 1.1 |
Component: | Dijit | Version: | 1.0 |
Keywords: | dijit.Tooltip Tooltip top left | Cc: | bill |
Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description
When you have a delay on a tooltip (to display) if during that delay the node becomes unavailable (new tab is selected in a tabContainer or display none'd? -- I know the tab test works) the timer is not stopped (how could it know really...) but when it fires, it makes no check to validate that the node its trying to open by is still available and you get stuck with Tooltips opening in the top left corner.... (and sometimes not going away w/o opening a 2nd tooltip and letting it go away naturally)
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 13 years ago by
comment:2 Changed 13 years ago by
Hmm I just made a test case or modified the test_TabContainer and it works fine... execpt even the stock test_TabContainer on nightly archives shows the tooltip way off to the right... Top tabContainer has a tab with a P tag that has a tooltip on it... hover over it and see...
I'll keep plugging at mine to see ifI can break a simple test case though.
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by
Cc: | bill added |
---|---|
Owner: | set to tk |
Status: | new → assigned |
Bill,
I cant reproduce this, but I did trace this to a possible bug in dojo.isDescendant().
onMouseOut for tooltip sometimes has wierd target/relatedTarget values (div.anonymous-div (which doesnt really exist!?!?) and when these are passed to dojo.isDescendant() it errors and returns -1 under its "squelch" branch... this -1 will eval as a "real event" in Tooltip and not kill the display(ed|ing) tooltip.
Patching the isDescendant() to return false on all "not true" states, fixes this problem....
Now the question is... should we patch core, or patch the dijit to check more strictly for !==true or ===true so -1 wont be true?
comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Closing out as invalid, since the problem was identified as being in Core. refs #5464
Hi. This is supposed to work because the target node gets an onblur or mouseout event. Not sure why it isn't. Can you attach a testcase? I could try to reproduce myself but it would be better if you made the testcase.