#287 closed defect (fixed)
[meta] Programatic widget test cases
| Reported by: | Brian Lucas | Owned by: | dante |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | high | Milestone: | 1.5 |
| Component: | Dijit | Version: | 0.2 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | tk, bill, dylan | |
| Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description (last modified by )
It would be helpful to have two different forms of instantiation in the widget test cases:
- script-based
- HTML markup-based
Only non-deprecated widgets need apply.
Change History (28)
comment:1 Changed 14 years ago by
| Owner: | changed from Dylan to dylan |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 Changed 14 years ago by
| Milestone: | 0.3release → 0.4 |
|---|
comment:3 Changed 13 years ago by
comment:4 Changed 13 years ago by
| Cc: | tk added |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | 0.4 → 0.4.1 |
we've made progress on this, but this is a lot of effort, so we'll move some of this effort to 0.4.1 (and maybe even 0.5). We also need to come up with a list of widgets that fail to work with programmatic instantiation.
comment:5 Changed 13 years ago by
| Milestone: | 0.4.1 → 0.6 |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from dylan to tk |
| Status: | assigned → new |
comment:7 Changed 13 years ago by
| Cc: | bill dylan added |
|---|
Going to recommend this be closed, with the new requirements for each package, this should be resolved on its own as things are ported to 0.9.
comment:8 Changed 13 years ago by
| Component: | General → Dijit |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | 0.9 → 1.0 |
Well, it would still be nice to have examples of programatic creation in each test, since we do (in theory) support that. Sometimes the differences are interesting, like for Buttons, specifying the label as a label attribute rather than innerHTML.
comment:9 Changed 13 years ago by
I thought that was part of the new test case/documentation requirements for Dijits/DojoX?
comment:10 Changed 12 years ago by
| Owner: | changed from tk to bill |
|---|
comment:11 Changed 12 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.0 → 1.1 |
|---|
comment:12 Changed 12 years ago by
See #4843: Menu/MenuItem? and ComboBox are the major ones not done.
comment:13 Changed 12 years ago by
| Summary: | include fromScript/createWidget tags with each widget test case → Programatic widget test cases |
|---|
comment:14 Changed 12 years ago by
comment:15 Changed 12 years ago by
| Owner: | changed from bill to dante |
|---|
comment:19 Changed 12 years ago by
| Summary: | Programatic widget test cases → [meta] Programatic widget test cases |
|---|
comment:22 Changed 12 years ago by
| Description: | modified (diff) |
|---|---|
| Milestone: | 1.2 |
| severity: | normal → major |
comment:23 Changed 12 years ago by
| Milestone: | → future |
|---|
comment:24 Changed 11 years ago by
comment:26 Changed 11 years ago by
(In [15322]) Better StackContainer? programmatic test. Refs #287.
comment:27 Changed 10 years ago by
| Milestone: | future → 1.6 |
|---|---|
| Resolution: | → fixed |
| Status: | new → closed |
there are enough programatic and robot tests for this to be moot. We should open individual tickets for missing programatic cases.
comment:28 Changed 10 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.6 → 1.5 |
|---|
(In [5866]) references #287 includes createWidget() examples for Clock, ColorPalette?, ComboBox?, DatePicker?, and DebugConsole?. Would have Dialog, but it is buggy... still trying to figure out whats going on with it.