Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #18612, comment 2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 26, 2015, 2:55:57 AM (6 years ago)
Author:
Michael Schall
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #18612, comment 2

    initial v1  
    1616}}}
    1717
    18 I suppose users of dijit may be relying on it as written.  Creating a new class is definitely more backward compatible.  Sounds good to me.  dijitInvisible?
     18I suppose users of dijit may be relying on it as written.  Creating a new class is definitely more backward compatible.  Sounds good to me.  `dijitInvisible`?
    1919
    2020I don't think I understand your `position:absolute` and `position: relative` statement.