Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #17228, comment 11


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 25, 2013, 8:44:02 AM (8 years ago)
Author:
cjolif
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #17228, comment 11

    initial v1  
    33Second I'm not aware of any issue being blocked in Dijit because Bill would have not committed something? The two you mentioned are closed as fixed right? That sounds reasonable to me pull requests are made against Dijit just as this one was a pull request against Core?
    44
    5 Third for this particular issue, the patch/PR does not apply cleanly to 1.9.x so Bill couldn't commit to it directly to 1.9.x.
     5Third for this particular issue, the patch/PR does not apply cleanly to 1.9.x so Bill couldn't commit it directly to 1.9.x.
    66
    77Fourth, maybe just gently asking to sbrunot to redo a pull request that applies cleanly to 1.9.x would have solved the issue instead of using strong words that are not solving any issue just making people angry?