Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #17050, comment 4


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 22, 2013, 8:46:57 AM (8 years ago)
Author:
Eric Durocher
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #17050, comment 4

    initial v1  
    33I don't quite agree with:
    44> If the content is bigger than the viewport, dojox/mobile/ScrollableViews need to be used.
    5 
     5because as I say in the other ticket an app could decide to create a page higher than the viewport and let the browser scroll it without using a !ScrollableView (assuming there are no fixed headers/footers of course).
    66
    77Again, you may be right that we could set {overflow: hidden} and not just overflow-x, but there is still a risk to break existing apps and you have an easy workaround...