Opened 6 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#17010 assigned enhancement
Should dojox.calendar class declarations specify the class name ?
| Reported by: | Claude Guyomard | Owned by: | dg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | undecided | Milestone: | 2.0 |
| Component: | Dojox | Version: | 1.8.3 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description
Many class/mixin definition files in dojox.calendar do not conform the following (http://livedocs.dojotoolkit.org/dojo/_base/declare#common-conventions) :
The class name (first argument of declare()) is omitted in new development. This ensures that the global namespace does not become polluted with classes and reduces the chances of name collisions. Classes in Dojo Toolkit introduced prior to Dojo 1.7 will include the class name for backwards compatability reasons.
Change History (2)
comment:1 Changed 6 years ago by
| Component: | DojoX Widgets → Dojox |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from dante to dg |
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 Changed 3 years ago by
| Milestone: | tbd → 2.0 |
|---|
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.
Probably it's too late to remove now, for back-compat reasons, but we'll remove it for 2.0.