Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #15953, comment 3


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 10, 2012, 7:22:18 PM (8 years ago)
Author:
Colin Snover
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #15953, comment 3

    initial v1  
    1 By that logic, I guess we shouldn’t check for `this._destroyed` in `this.destroy` either then because people shouldn’t call it more than once.
     1By that logic, I guess we shouldn’t check for `this._destroyed` in `this.destroy` either then because people shouldn’t call it more than once. By the way, how are consumers of widgets supposed to know that they can’t call `set` anymore without violating private access rules and checking the private variable `widget._destroyed` exactly?