Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #15631, comment 15


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 23, 2013, 8:14:21 AM (8 years ago)
Author:
cjolif
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #15631, comment 15

    initial v1  
    33Now about putting this in 1.9, the problem is that the more we put post-freeze deadline the more the risk we introduce a regression is increasing and thus the risk we have to delay the release. While you might not care about the release date, some others do care and actually 1.9 was mostly built around some contributions that have to be released early May (see 1.9 document) for both users benefit but also Dojo itself benefit (wrt to competition). I understand this is not easing your life, but until Dojo 2.0 and a separate release cycle for each sub projects I think what mostly drove a release should be valued more when determining a release cut than a bug that is here for months.
    44
    5 That said if everyone in copy of this bug is very confident with this fix from a regression perspective and if we do another RC because of a real regression (which might happen because of #16683) there might be an opportunity to get it in. I will not object to it being committed if those two conditions are filled even though I really hope this will not put us in trouble.
     5That said if everyone in copy of this bug is very confident with this fix from a regression perspective and if we do another RC because of a real regression (which might happen because of #16683 or #17061) there might be an opportunity to get it in. I will not object to it being committed if those two conditions are filled even though I really hope this will not put us in trouble.