Support map for packageMap
With AMD adding support for map to the spec (instead of the name packageMap), should we add support for both names to 1.8 to improve AMD interop?
Change History (14)
Milestone: |
tbd →
1.8
|
Priority: |
undecided →
blocker
|
Status: |
new →
assigned
|
Milestone: |
1.8 →
future
|
Priority: |
blocker →
high
|
Milestone: |
future →
1.8
|
Priority: |
high →
blocker
|
Milestone: |
1.8 →
future
|
Priority: |
blocker →
high
|
Resolution: |
→ fixed
|
Status: |
assigned →
closed
|
Resolution: |
fixed
|
Status: |
closed →
reopened
|
Resolution: |
→ fixed
|
Status: |
reopened →
closed
|
Rawld said he wants to punt this to future, and that the packageMap isn't part of the spec yet (although I didn't know there even was an official spec).