Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#15342 closed enhancement (invalid)
Dojo needs a more powerful equivalent to jQuery's offset() method
Reported by: | Thomas Bachem | Owned by: | Thomas Bachem |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | undecided | Milestone: | tbd |
Component: | HTML | Version: | 1.7.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description
Even when using dojo.position()
's includeScroll
parameter, parent elements with "overflow: scroll
" get simply ignored in the calculation.
This makes the use of dojo.position()
for elements within scrollable containers pretty much useless.
jQuery and Mootools are able to include these containers in its offset calculation, see e.g. the getOffset() method in http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.7.2.js.
Attachments (1)
Change History (3)
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
Owner: | changed from Eugene Lazutkin to Thomas Bachem |
---|---|
Status: | new → pending |
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | pending → closed |
Because we get so many tickets, we often need to return them to the initial reporter for more information. If that person does not reply within 14 days, the ticket will automatically be closed, and that has happened in this case. If you still are interested in pursuing this issue, feel free to add a comment with the requested information and we will be happy to reopen the ticket if it is still valid. Thanks!
Huh? It does account for overflow:scroll elements. I'll attach my test case. If you can produce an example that doesn't work please attach it and repopen the ticket or add a comment.