Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #14967, comment 7


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 7, 2012, 3:29:55 PM (9 years ago)
Author:
ben hockey
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #14967, comment 7

    initial v1  
    33if you really do mean that your widget has a Foo then just wrap your template in another div and everything should work.
    44
    5 i don't think there's a need to try to support this since i think if you're putting a widget on the domNode of your template then conceptually your widget is an extension of that kind of widget and your js really should extend that widget.
     5i don't think there's a need to try to support a widget on the domNode since i think if you're putting a widget on the domNode of your template then conceptually your widget is an extension of that kind of widget and your js really should extend that widget.