dojo.replaceClass arguments are un-intuitive replace(new, old) vs replace(old, new)
|Reported by:||ktiedt||Owned by:||elazutkin|
Since there was 0 response on the contrib list, opening a formal ticket
Since we are finally updating internally to 1.6 based code we came
across dojo.replaceClass and were a bit confused by the argument
orders that were chosen...
dojo.replaceClass(node, new, old) completely disregards decades of
already learned API in almost every language out there (including
Typical replace functions *always* replace(old, new)... I am curious
why suddenly this method diverged from that...
Change History (4)
comment:3 Changed 2 years ago by elazutkin
- Priority changed from high to undecided
- Type changed from defect to enhancement