Opened 11 years ago

Closed 10 years ago

#13250 closed enhancement (fixed)

add a toString to StatefulModel

Reported by: ben hockey Owned by: rahul
Priority: high Milestone: 1.7
Component: DojoX MVC Version: 1.7.0b1
Keywords: Cc:
Blocked By: Blocking:


trying to use StatefulModel?, i've found it a little bit annoying when trying to display values of leaf nodes to have to use .value - ie var str = model.node.value rather than var str = model.value. i think a toString on StatefulModel? could be useful. something like this...

toString: function () {
        return this.value === "" ? : this.value.toString();

Attachments (1)

13250-mvc.patch (2.2 KB) - added by Ed Chatelain 11 years ago.
Patch to add toString() and valueOf() to StatefulModel?, and a test update to verify it.

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (11)

comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by ben hockey

hmm... update to the toString

toString: function () {
    return this.value === "" && ? : this.value.toString();

comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by rahul

Seems OK, though really what you're after is the value at a given node in the model, so perhaps toValue() is a better name.

comment:3 Changed 11 years ago by ben hockey

i've given some thought to what it is i'm trying to achieve with this and what i want is for nodes that represent primitive values (leaf nodes) to be able to act as those primitives without having to reference the value property. there is already good support for "hiding" the model for non-primitives (arrays and objects) such that you can reference to get to the bar node but then you need to use bar.value to get its value.

toString and valueOf are special methods in javascript (see for a good explanation) and both of these would be useful for "hiding" the underlying structure of a leaf node. the idea being that if i have that represents then i can easily convert existing code (in my case, mostly templates that are doing string substitution) to code without needing to change everything to there will probably be some exceptions that need to be handled but this convenience provided by toString and valueOf would go a long way to simplifying the transition imo.

if i understand the way that StatefulModel? stores data then i think the following valueOf and toString methods would work for all nodes in a model regardless of whether they represent a primitive.

valueOf: function () {
    // return the data that this node represents
toString: function () {
    // return the toString of the data that this node represents

i'm not locked into these implementations if i've misunderstood the structure of the internals of StatefulModel? or you have alternative implementations for toString and valueOf but just thought that this kind of convenience might be useful.

comment:4 Changed 11 years ago by Ed Chatelain holds the last saved model state, so if a change has been made but not saved it will not be set into, so I don't think the latest proposal for valueOf() and toString() functions are right. Actually I think your previous proposal for toString() is good, and valueOf is actually the same as the toPlainObject() function.

Should we create a valueOf() function that just calls this.toPlainObject() inorder to have a valueOf function? I guess another option is to rename toPlainObject() to valueOf, but that would hit a lot of tests, or we could not have support for valueOf().

I think we should add the valueOf() and have it call toPlainObject(). And I think we should add the toString() as well.

I will create a patch for it, but if anyone objects I can rework the patch.

Changed 11 years ago by Ed Chatelain

Attachment: 13250-mvc.patch added

Patch to add toString() and valueOf() to StatefulModel?, and a test update to verify it.

comment:5 Changed 10 years ago by Ed Chatelain

Since there were no objections to my proposal above, I made this update along with others via this changeset: In [26567] which was made for ticket #13773

comment:6 Changed 10 years ago by ben hockey

the code seems fine. you could make some changes to the tests to properly test what is intended for valueOf and toString. the calls to these are meant to be implicit so tests should be more like this:

valueOfTest = new dojox.mvc.StatefulModel({ data: 42 });,," is wrong");,valueOfTest.value,"valueOfTest.value is wrong");,+valueOfTest,"valueOfTest.valueOf() is wrong");"42",'' + valueOfTest,"valueOfTest.toString() is wrong");

toStringTest = new dojox.mvc.StatefulModel({ data: 'abc' });'abc',," is wrong");'abc',toStringTest.value,"toStringTest.value is wrong");,+toStringTest,"toStringTest.valueOf() is wrong");'abc','' + toStringTest,"toStringTest.toString() is wrong");

sorry for not looking at this sooner. the implementation seems fine so i don't think its a big deal if the tests aren't updated. however, the changes would be a demonstration of the intended usage for anyone looking at the tests.

comment:7 Changed 10 years ago by Ed Chatelain

Thanks for the tests, I think I will create a new testcase for this and commit it next time I have an mvc update.

comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by Ed Chatelain

I have updated a test case to include your test above, with this update: So I think this ticket can be closed, but unfortunately I don't have the permissions to close it.

comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by ben hockey

Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by bill

Milestone: tbd1.7
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.