#10687 closed defect (invalid)
filteringselect doesn't initialize properly if value is set but no options are available!
| Reported by: | gerhard presser | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | high | Milestone: | tbd |
| Component: | Dijit - Form | Version: | 1.4.0 |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description
<select dojoType="dijit.form.FilteringSelect?" value="1"></select>
gives a js-error (node is not defined - at dojo.attr) and all other widgets fail to load.
this markup worked in 1.3.2 but fails in 1.4(.1)
I attached a possible patch for this problem. I don't know if item==null is a valid scenario for the onItem callback!?
Attachments (2)
Change History (7)
Changed 9 years ago by
comment:1 Changed 9 years ago by
| Milestone: | 1.4.2 → tbd |
|---|---|
| Priority: | high → normal |
| Resolution: | → invalid |
| severity: | major → minor |
| Status: | new → closed |
Changed 9 years ago by
| Attachment: | test_FilteringSelect.html added |
|---|
comment:2 Changed 9 years ago by
| Resolution: | invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | closed → reopened |
I also believe this is a bug. I've run into a similar situation where I do have options for the select, but the value set in markup does not match the value of any of the options.
I've attached a simple test case where there are two options (A and C) but the value is set to B. If you run it with Dojo 1.3.2, then the value is set to blank (with a validation tooltip when required==true). But if you run it with Dojo 1.4(.1) then the js error (node is undefined) is given and the widget fails to load.
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
Also, I forgot to mention, the submitted patch by gpresser makes my test work.
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by
| Resolution: | → invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | reopened → closed |
Sorry, but you were both depending on a bug in 1.3 that was fixed in 1.4.
comment:5 Changed 8 years ago by
| Component: | Dijit → Dijit - Form |
|---|
I don't understand, you haven't specified a data store at all for the filtering select. You need to specify a store (or a set of options, which is implicitly turned into a store) that defines an item with id=1.