Opened 11 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#10442 closed enhancement (invalid)
DojoCampus docs ... option to suppress masthead/navigation at top of webpage
Reported by: | deanw | Owned by: | deanw |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | high | Milestone: | tbd |
Component: | Website | Version: | 1.4.0b |
Keywords: | dojocampus nochrome | Cc: | Dustin Machi |
Blocked By: | Blocking: |
Description
Requesting a "headless" version of the DojoCampus? docs. ie an additional option to existing DojoCampus? urls that causes the masthead at the top of the page to be suppressed/omitted.
Many websites support a "headerless/nochrome" option to faciliate simple direct "iframe" type embedding of content in other webpages/contexts ... would be nice if DojoCampus? docs allowed this also.
PS ... re our two main websites ... 1) dojotoolkit.org and 2) DojoCampus? .... such a "headerless/nochrome" option might provide options for more seamlessly iframe/embedding relevant DojoCampus? content within a parent Dojotoolkit webpage ... at least some key Dojocampus pages could be inlined/embedded in dojotoolkit in this way. low tech partial solution to better integrating these two separate websites. ( the strategic plan on this topic not clear to me )
Thanks !
Change History (4)
comment:1 Changed 11 years ago by
Cc: | Dustin Machi added |
---|---|
Component: | General → Website |
Owner: | changed from anonymous to tklipstein |
comment:2 Changed 11 years ago by
Owner: | changed from tklipstein to klipstein |
---|
comment:3 Changed 9 years ago by
Owner: | changed from klipstein to deanw |
---|---|
Status: | new → pending |
docs have been moved from dojocampus to http://livedocs.dojotoolkit.org/
is this issue still relevant? if there's no response within 14 days it will close automatically.
comment:4 Changed 9 years ago by
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | pending → closed |
Because we get so many tickets, we often need to return them to the initial reporter for more information. If that person does not reply within 14 days, the ticket will automatically be closed, and that has happened in this case. If you still are interested in pursuing this issue, feel free to add a comment with the requested information and we will be happy to reopen the ticket if it is still valid. Thanks!
not sure if we're using trac for this sort of thing